Back to Articles

Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: An Intuitive Guide

AI Insights Portal
Technology
reinforcement learning for LLMsRL for large language modelssupervised learningreward signal

Reinforcement learning for LLMs (large language models) is revolutionizing the field of artificial intelligence by enabling models to learn beyond the constraints of supervised learning. This article provides an intuitive overview of RL for large language models, ideal for technical readers seeking to understand its core concepts and transformative impact.

Supervised Learning vs. Reinforcement Learning in LLMs

Traditionally, large language models have relied on supervised learning, which involves two main stages: pre-training on vast text corpora and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). In supervised learning, models are shown explicit input-output pairs, mapping prompts to human-approved responses—essentially learning from an extensive answer key.

However, this approach faces two major challenges:

  1. High-quality, unbiased supervised data is costly and limited.
  2. Models must generalize from finite data to solve all possible problems—a difficult assumption.

This leads to a 'data bottleneck,' where obtaining more annotated data becomes impractical. Human annotation is time-consuming, expensive, and prone to bias or errors.

Why Reinforcement Learning is Transformative for LLMs

Reinforcement learning for LLMs addresses these limitations by:

  • Learning from weak supervision: RL enables models to learn from reward signals, such as human preferences, rule-based evaluations, or AI-generated scores, rather than explicit answers. This allows for iterative optimization and improvement, even without a single correct answer.
  • Exploration through trial and error: RL empowers models to explore various strategies, discovering novel solutions not present in the original training data. This exploration is essential for advancing beyond the model's initial knowledge base.

Comparing Loss Functions: SFT vs. RL

In supervised fine-tuning, the loss function is typically:

L_SFT(θ) = -E_{x, y* ~ D} [log π_θ(y|x)]

Where:

  • x: input prompt
  • y*: expert answer
  • D: dataset
  • π_θ: model's policy (probability of output y)

The goal is to align the model's output with expert responses.

In reinforcement learning, the loss function is:

L_RL(θ) = -E_{x ~ D, y ~ π_θ(y|x)} [w(x, y) log π_θ(y|x)]

Image description

Key differences in RL for LLMs:

  • Negative weights for learning from mistakes: RL allows negative weights (from reward or advantage functions), enabling the model to learn from undesirable outcomes and avoid repeating errors. This supports exploration and the elimination of suboptimal strategies.
  • Self-improving feedback loop: In RL, the model generates its own outputs, receives feedback (weights), updates its policy, and iterates. This loop enables continuous self-improvement, potentially reaching superhuman performance if the reward mechanism is well-designed.

Core Research Questions in RL for LLMs

Current research in reinforcement learning for large language models focuses on:

  1. How are weights calculated? Translating weak signals (reward scores) into precise weights w(x, y) using methods from simple filtering to advanced value estimation.
  2. How is the reward signal obtained? Developing efficient reward sourcing, including learnable reward models, rule-based systems, and AI evaluators.
  3. What is the optimal training strategy? Deciding between online vs. offline training, on-policy vs. off-policy data, and appropriate batch sizes.
  4. How should prompts be designed? Optimizing prompt distribution and sequencing, especially for specialized domains like mathematics.
  5. What are the prerequisites for the base model? Ensuring the SFT model is capable of effective exploration and adaptation during RL.

For more on these topics, see our articles on [RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback)](Related topic 1) and [Policy Optimization in LLMs](Related topic 2).

Summary: The Value of RL for LLMs

Reinforcement learning introduces mechanisms for self-improvement and exploration that overcome the limitations of supervised learning in LLMs. Ongoing research aims to optimize reward calculation, data sourcing, training strategies, prompt design, and base model selection. Future articles in this series will explore these areas in depth, highlighting the latest advancements in RL for large language models.