Agent Technology Hub

Hub

Build intelligent agent systems

Explore Hub
Technology

LangChain vs. LangGraph vs. LangSmith: Which to Use?

Confused by the LangChain ecosystem? Learn the key differences between LangChain, LangGraph, and LangSmith to choose the right tool for your LLM stack.
Shen Du Xue Xi Shi Jue
8 min read
#LangChain vs LangGraph#LangChain#LangGraph#LangSmith#AI Agent#Agent Development#LLM Development

Editor's Note: As businesses increasingly prioritize sustainability, the challenge of balancing economic growth with environmental responsibility becomes more pronounced. This trend raises important questions about the true cost of progress: How can organizations innovate while minimizing their ecological footprint? As we navigate this complex landscape, it’s crucial to consider not just the immediate benefits, but also the long-term implications of our choices on both the planet and future generations.


LangChain vs. LangGraph vs. LangSmith: A Guide to the Modern LLM Stack

Building sophisticated applications with Large Language Models (LLMs) is more than just connecting to an API. As projects scale, developers face a critical challenge: managing complexity and ensuring reliability. The LangChain ecosystem offers a layered solution with three key tools: LangChain, LangGraph, and LangSmith. In short, LangChain provides the core components for LLM apps, LangGraph orchestrates complex, stateful agent workflows, and LangSmith offers the essential observability to debug, monitor, and optimize them in production. Understanding their distinct roles is crucial for building a modern LLM stack.

LangChain: The Building Blocks of LLM Apps

As the foundational framework, LangChain’s core value is providing modular components for building LLM applications. It elegantly wraps concepts like Prompt templates, Memory mechanisms, and Tool integrations, powering patterns like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and simple, sequential chains.

LangChain is, in essence, a set of Lego bricks for your LLM application. By snapping together a PromptTemplate, an LLM module, and a Chain to link the steps, developers can rapidly build linear workflows. If your application follows a straightforward "input-process-output" path without complex branching—like a Q&A bot or document summarizer—LangChain is your go-to framework.

LangGraph: Orchestrating Complex LLM Agent Workflows

LangGraph steps in when your application's logic is anything but a straight line. As an extension of LangChain, it’s purpose-built to orchestrate dynamic and complex workflows. When a task requires state management, conditional branching, or collaboration between multiple AI agents, a simple linear chain is insufficient. This is where a graph-based structure for building stateful agents truly shines.

LangGraph models tasks using a simple but powerful triad: Nodes, Edges, and State.

  • Nodes are functions or tools that perform a specific action.
  • Edges are the pathways that connect the nodes, directing the flow of logic.
  • A central State object is passed between nodes, allowing the application to maintain context.

This architecture is a natural fit for cyclical logic, human-in-the-loop approvals, and multi-agent systems, making it the cornerstone for building robust, production-grade agents.

LangSmith: LLM Observability and Ops

If LangChain and LangGraph are for building your app, LangSmith is for running it. It's the quality control and optimization center that tackles the "black box" problem in AI development. By providing comprehensive LLM observability, LangSmith turns mystery into clarity.

Its core capabilities are essential for any serious LLM project:

  • End-to-end tracing of every call and component
  • Precise token and cost tracking to manage your budget
  • Prompt versioning and A/B testing playgrounds
  • Performance monitoring for latency, error rates, and user feedback
  • Automated evaluation datasets to prevent regressions

📊 Cost Planning: While LangSmith tracks your actual token usage, plan your budget upfront using our Token Calculator to estimate costs across different models like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini before deployment.

Whether you're debugging a faulty chain or fine-tuning performance in production, LangSmith makes the inner workings of your LLM application completely transparent and traceable.


Let's make this concrete with a real-world example: processing a refund for a new iPhone 17. This single process is a perfect microcosm for understanding when to use each tool.

Scenario 1: Simple Q&A – A Job for LangChain

When a user asks, "Can I return the iPhone 17 I just bought?", the task is straightforward information retrieval. A simple, linear "retrieve policy → generate answer" chain is all you need.

This is LangChain's sweet spot. You can implement this quickly:

  1. Use a DocumentLoader to ingest the company's return policy.
  2. Create a VectorStore for fast, semantic search (a core part of RAG).
  3. Build an LLMChain that retrieves the relevant policy, injects it into a prompt, and generates a clear answer.

🔧 RAG Optimization: For effective retrieval in your LangChain RAG pipeline, the chunking strategy is critical. Experiment with different chunk sizes using our RAG Chunk Lab to find the optimal balance between context and precision.

The entire workflow is linear and stateless, which is what LangChain excels at.

Scenario 2: Fully Automated Refunds – Enter LangGraph

Now, consider a specific request: "I activated the iPhone 17 I bought 3 days ago and want to return it. Can you process that for me?"

Here, the complexity increases. It's a stateful process with multiple steps and conditional logic:

  1. Verify Purchase Date: Is it within the 14-day window? (Yes/No branch)
  2. Check Activation Status: It's activated, triggering a special process.
  3. Call Order System API: Retrieve order details.
  4. Generate Return Instructions: Guide the user on wiping their data.
  5. Create RMA: Interface with the logistics system.
  6. Notify User: Send final confirmation.

A simple LangChain sequence can't handle this branching logic, but LangGraph's structure is tailor-made for it. Each step becomes a node, and the logic dictating the path becomes an edge. This could even be implemented as a multi-agent system where a "Policy Agent" and an "Order Agent" collaborate, orchestrated by LangGraph.

Scenario 3: Debugging and Optimization with LangSmith

The automated refund system is live, but there are issues: high latency and incorrect rejections. It's time for debugging LLM applications with LangSmith.

Using LangSmith's visual trace views, the team can analyze every execution:

  • Performance Bottleneck: They spot that the API call to the "Order System" is taking 8 seconds. That's the source of the latency.
  • Logical Error: By inspecting the "Policy Interpretation" node, they find the prompt is ambiguous about "activated devices," causing the LLM to misinterpret the policy.
  • Cost Anomaly: The trace reveals redundant LLM calls to check the policy.

Armed with these insights from powerful LLM observability, the team uses LangSmith to iterate. They adjust the API timeout, refine the prompt, and refactor the graph. The result is a faster, more accurate, and cheaper system.

LangChain vs. LangGraph vs. LangSmith: Key Differences

The distinct roles of these frameworks define their ideal applications. This table breaks down the key differences:

FeatureLangChainLangGraphLangSmith
Core FunctionProvides modular components (Chains, Tools, Prompts)Orchestrates complex, stateful workflowsProvides observability, debugging, and testing
StructureLinear, sequential chainsCyclical graphs (Nodes, Edges, State)Monitoring dashboard and tracing platform
Best ForSimple, stateless applications (Q&A bots, summarizers)Multi-step agents, human-in-the-loop processesAll production applications for monitoring and optimization
AnalogyA set of Lego bricksThe conductor of an orchestraThe mission control center

How to Choose: LangChain, LangGraph, or LangSmith?

In practice, you can quickly land on the right tool by asking yourself three simple questions:

  1. Is your workflow a straight line? If it's a simple "input → process → output" flow with no branching, start and end with LangChain.
  2. Does your app need to remember things, loop, or make decisions? If the process involves cycles, conditional logic, or multiple agents, you need the orchestration power of LangGraph.
  3. Are you building for production? The moment your application is on a path to real users, LangSmith becomes non-negotiable for ensuring reliability and performance.

The Power of Three: A Synergistic LLM Stack

Ultimately, these tools aren't mutually exclusive; they're designed to be synergistic. The real magic happens when you combine them. A common and powerful pattern emerges: use LangChain to build the components, LangGraph to orchestrate the workflow, and LangSmith to monitor the entire system.

You'd use LangChain to construct the core capabilities of each individual agent, LangGraph to manage the complex collaboration between them, and LangSmith to keep the entire LLM stack running smoothly, efficiently, and transparently.

Managing LLM Costs

When building production applications with LangChain, LangGraph, or LangSmith, managing API costs is crucial. Estimate your token usage and costs with our specialized calculators:

Key Takeaways

• LangChain is essential for building core components of LLM applications.
• LangGraph helps manage complex, stateful workflows effectively.
• LangSmith enables observability for debugging and optimizing LLM applications.

Explore More in Agent Technology Hub

This article is part of our Agent Technology series. Discover more insights and practical guides.

Visit Agent Technology Hub

About This Article

Topic: Technology
Difficulty: Intermediate
Reading Time: 8 minutes
Last Updated: September 24, 2025

This article is part of our comprehensive guide to Large Language Models and AI technologies. Stay updated with the latest developments in the AI field.

All Articles
Share this article to spread LLM knowledge